Видео

Anchor is herself biased and opinionated..😂😂😂

Well done to this host, Ghada! She held that snake Douglas Murray’s feet to the fire and he’s not used to it

The host should look in the mirror her behavior is the exact problem she says she is against

What a charlatan this Douglas Murray is! He didn’t spew his usual anti-muslim rhetoric while in Doha and happily accepts being paid by Muslims to speak at a debate 😂

Thank you Qatar for hosting this pro-Israeli 🇮🇱 Hasbara gay 🏳️‍🌈 athiest who hates everything Qatar stands for 😂

Thank you Qatar for hosting this pro-Israeli 🇮🇱 Hasbara gay 🏳️‍🌈 athiest who hates everything Qatar stands for 😂

The debate host constantly expressed her biases and pushed her own agenda. Also, what debate has a voting system and is centered around social media and opinions on there? This is a horrible way to discuss the serious and tragic problem of refugees seeking help. The debate host does not seem to really care to address the concerns and is more focused on how many social media reactions they get.

Disgrace from a host who is only provoking and seek gulty in others.

😊❤

जय श्री राम🚩🚩🚩🚩🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤

This moderator, Ms. Ghida Fakhry, was a disgrace as a host. She was rude, hostile, aggressive, distespectful and totally bias when it came to Douglas Murray. She did not behave that way with the other guests. Repeatedly, she asked questions but never let him answer and even when he was given a brief moment to respond she constantly talked over him. The audience seemed to be cherry-picked, clapping at her attempts to score points, making for an overall one-sided stance on this issue. This was a sham of a debate in reality and the first thing that needs to change for future Duha debates, in my view, is a host that is an unbiased facilater for the panel guests not a strongly politicised agitater who does not care to listen to other points of view.

“How many people of Syria have you made citizens in Qatar.” Why are they all smiling?

Ameen

Douglas the ONLY person talking sense here

GREAT DEBATE I REALY ENJOYED IT

WHO GIVE THE BRITISH TAX PAYER AID WHO CAN'T PAY THERE BILLS BECOMING HOMELESS DUE TO DIABOLICAL POLITICIANS GIVING OUR MONEY AWAY

Debate the political leaders in China? Yeah good luck my dude.

The host is incredibly biased, you can feel the passion and hurt as she argued with Douglas Murray, who she attempts to position as uncaring which is simply untrue. He presented very real questions for us to posit about 'mercy' and 'justice', and that is the responsibility of the global community to look after refugees. Why is she so determined to make him look bad with things hes never said?

The outsmarting media worldwide embracing all opinions and attitudes of the world with fair outlook.

Islam and Christianity should live on separate sides of the world, Christianity doesn't punish people for there belief, and doesn't belittle women, GOD MADE MAN man made religion as a mechanism of control, Islam is the worst type of control, it's a shame it can't leave it's radical side behind, there are good Muslims as there are Christians

I don’t understand why the host is so confrontational with only Murry,& keeps interrupting only him. She’s insufferable,& very biased. A host should always remain neutral.

3 femanists a gay dude and a black guy 😅 Murray is the only sensible guest.

My god😅 Douglas sure was the black sheep in this "debate"?. Poor man.

Salute both of u

I think it is remarkable that this debate is taking place in Qatar, and it is encouraging to see such a vital discussion on the global refugee crisis being addressed in an open and unprejudiced manner. This kind of discourse is essential for fostering understanding and finding solutions. However, I couldn't help but notice that the host exhibited clear biases, which is unfortunate in a debate of this significance. All the panelists brought valuable perspectives to the table, each presenting both commendable and questionable points. The diversity of opinions is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the refugee crisis. As a host nation, we must undoubtedly put in more effort to help refugees integrate into our society. This, however, is a two-way street. The newcomers also bear the responsibility to actively participate in and embrace their new communities. One point that stood out to me was the discussion around clashing ideologies, which seemed to be narrowly focused on the wearing of the Hijab in the UK. The issue of integration extends far beyond this. Our collective failure to facilitate integration, coupled with a lack of willingness from some arriving cultures, has led to the formation of insular communities. These communities sometimes hold ideologies that are at odds with the values of their new home, such as advocating for Sharia Law. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with the culture and beliefs of a free society. It often contradicts principles of equality, freedom, and individual rights, which are cornerstones of modern democratic societies. This clash is not a minor issue; it represents a significant challenge in creating a cohesive and unified community. While the majority of refugees are peaceful and seek a better life, there is a concerning undercurrent of attempts to introduce cultural elements that may not align with the host country’s values. This includes efforts to undermine and remove freedoms from marginalized groups, like the LGBTQ+ community. Ensuring that the principles of freedom and equality are upheld is essential for maintaining the integrity of our society. Moreover, I felt that the debate inadequately addressed women’s rights. This is a critical aspect that cannot be overlooked. Ensuring that women’s rights are upheld and respected should be a fundamental part of the integration process. It is essential to create an environment where all individuals, regardless of gender, can thrive and contribute to society. In conclusion, while the debate was a significant step forward, it is clear that there are deeper, more complex issues that need to be addressed. The responsibility for successful integration lies with both the host nations and the refugees. Open, unbiased dialogue is the key to finding sustainable solutions that respect and uphold the values of all involved. It is vital to address the incompatibility of certain ideologies, like Sharia Law, with the principles of a free society, and ensure that integration efforts are inclusive and respectful of fundamental human rights.

Respect to this man

Let the man talk god damit 🫡 Douglas

Human value has been usurped and stolen by international banking cartels who are running a totalitarian scam, weaponizing immigration to destroy sovereign countries, repackage global slavery by pricing climate change.

Alll

The moderator doesn't listen nor is respectful to allow ideas to arise in clarity: who is this woman working for? She is so annoying constantly intersecting her statistics avoiding wisdom to arise. She is so robotic welded to her thought regime.

I am a legal citizen in America, and was told to go back to Jamaica by a black person. Get over it people. Whose fault is it.

Ghida Fakhry was horrible as a moderator and should not be invited back.

What nation destabilized the Global South MLH????

No, the gun violence in the USA is not coming from white men. School shootings represent a fraction of homicides in the USA. 50% come from Black men, who equal 6% of the population.

The White House is the threat? What an idiotic comment.

Bogus argument about the amount spent on defense v. peace. Where do these figures come from? The peace maker woman has no clue about world realities.

This is not a debate. It is the moderator going after Douglas Murray. She talks so fast and jumps around to different subjects so quick that she is not able to make a coherent, reasonable statement.

MLH is a Marxist, anti-USA and though very bright, allows his ideologies to overwhelm common sense reality and practicality.

🤣 "Freedom of expression; " then loading the debate 4 versus 1!

So much entitlement. We do not owe you anything. Sort out your own countries.

I am sick and tired of the conflation between the holocaust and what is going on in Syria or Afghanistan. The victims of the holocaust were Europeans suffering the worst massacre in human history. How is that even similar to what's going on in Syria and Afghanistan? These people do not share our culture and we do not owe them a living. Why doesn't Qatar open their borders? Why is it Europe and America which must face this invasion? We do not want them here and, believe me, indigenous Europeans are getting pissed off. Moreover, Marc Lamont Hill is not even close to being an intellectual equal to Douglas Murray.

That presenter or moderator is RUDE... Loaded questions and statements

To me a burqa means that the person wearing it has a religious & political predisposition. A religious bigot and apologist that are steadfast in their beliefs come what will. I have no idea why I should respect that. I accept that if you will, but I will not respect that. And Qatar, an authoritarian monarchy, hosting a dialogue about free speech is an audacity in itself. Let's put it to the test. Open a hooters in Qatar and see how that goes.

🗼📻🗼📻🗼📻🗼📻🗼📻🗼📻🗼📻🗼

. ....

islamic colonialism extends to south east asia much earlier than western countries

the moderator who deosnt want to be answered

like black people in the US their lives only matters

? sabse bada

I couldn’t stop laughing when I whatched this😅